According to God of Prompt on Twitter, OX Security analyzed over 300 code repositories, including 50 that used AI tools such as Copilot, Cursor, and Claude, and confirmed that while AI-generated code is not individually lower in quality, its rapid velocity introduces systemic risk to software development (source: @godofprompt). The study highlights that AI enables software teams to ship projects in days instead of months, but existing security audits and architecture reviews cannot keep pace, leading to widespread deployment of vulnerabilities. Notably, AI-generated code exhibits predictable anti-patterns, such as redundant comments and lack of refactoring, which scale quickly and are difficult to remediate at volume. The business implication is that organizations leveraging AI coding tools must overhaul their security and review processes to match the new scale and speed enabled by AI, or risk introducing critical vulnerabilities at unprecedented rates (source: @godofprompt, OX Security analysis).